Nonostante mi occupi di complotti ormai da anni per conto del Cicap, non riesco ancora capire perchè ci debba essere tutto questo astio nei confronti di chi, giustamente, si pone questions instead of believing a priori any conspiracy theory's being dished up. Recently some Sion030984 asked me some questions about YouTube, only to accuse me of every wickedness and fled laughing dialogue in an arrogant way.
I propose some details of the discussion:
" when you wondered how the trails round and you said you've never seen a circular trail and a plane that made a maneuver to U. After a lot of you have shown the 'evidence, rather than looking to admit such evidence and have continued to spread nonsense and even absurd theories on circular trails. "
According Zion I replied that he had never seen an aircraft to maneuver at U and I was shown. Too bad that a few years I say what I think of contrails form particular example here or here or even here. But the best is yet to come:
" keep saying nonsense, do not tell me you do not take a lot of money who are the good Samaritans who spend much of their time to deny the existence of something. I think any normal person can see that if there is a group that believes in God and bread they forgot to leave the nutella. [...] enough to hear such crap that you have given to explain the crop circles : "animali che si inseguono per accoppiarsi" uahuahuah!!! "
La risata finale è sempre garanzia di acume e intelligenza nelle argomentazioni. In ogni caso in queste poche righe i nostro ha collezionato una serie di errori e inesattezze. Per esempio nello statuto è chiarito che i soci del Cicap non percepiscono nulla e che è garantita la libertà di fede, anzi è proprio precisato che di fede il Cicap non si occupa. Il discorso degli animali è ancora una volta completamente inventato e la spiegazione è pubblica qui . In realtà il Cicap non fece questa ipotesi ma fu il CUN e anzi il Cicap commentava tale ipotesi ritenendola improbabile. Anche in questo caso il tutto è pubblico da anni, What Sion did far more than a laugh?
As was suggested that I had never allowed my many mistakes, I asked her to admit to Zion. Obviously he did not, but he fled laughing as he was arrived not hold more gems like this:
" I consider you among the worst scum of the earth" or " maybe I'll make a nice article that demonstrates Ostre pseudo-explanations to the events and your bad faith " or" Now let me conclude if you do not mind, I was at home all afternoon and I would go out, I also have my private life . "
We know that Zion is not the only one to blame for no reason with those who try to ask questions. Even those who protested against the report seems to still have residual anger enough to publish this article which states:
" The leading member of this association by doubts purposes is the self-described journalist Paul Attivissimo [ ...]"
Cicap The association would be, but how? These people should dismantle a global conspiracy and still did not understand that is not representative of Attivissimo Cicap and especially that he is not responsible for the investigation of chemtrails ?
yet been written for years on the site of that Cicap Very active and is an expert that I am the coordinator of work on trails. This
their poor knowledge of the issues which should be an expert but does not prevent him from using tones inquisition publishing addresses of those who believe "disinformation." Maybe instead of laughing and spreading words of hate would first study, if nothing else, at least the roles of people with whom they are dealing with.
The worst thing is that these people are those who claim to be the "executioners", the "fighters for the truth hidden by the evil powers."
also said that my blog section opens the goodnews. Among all the envy I must admit that I found a person with whom you can talk: Rev Stone. Remember the test with the orgone ?! Well it was made, I'm throwing down the guide so as to explain how it went, but I must say that the Rev is right to give credit for having an open dialogue without insults, without anger and without deceit. We talked quietly for months each on its own situation and not expect others to change his mind, and finally to an agreement. I must admit that in recent emails exchanged after the test, we confirmed both the respect for each other's positions and the need to get out of this circle of hatred and attacks continue. I am in complete agreement when he said that the Italian situation is now reduced to two sides entrenched in their positions that they spend their time to insult and mock each other and not seek more truth. Not everyone is crazy
of malice and that is to keep in mind when talking about chemtrails, unfortunately, very often we tend to forget this, by identifying a theory with the most extremist faction that supports it. Remember that it is not always the case.
