The strange memories of a "sciachimista" The After transmission of reports dedicated to the service Cicap, began raining insults and attacks in style conspiracy.
mention some of the best comments found around:
The problem is that those of CICAP (and disinformation on the net assets managed by them), are paid by someone very high up to protect the interests of the bastards who poison us. There is no doubt that the CICAP is linked to intelligence and the elites who coordinate and manage the misinformation on the Web and out of the Net's not forget that Angioni is the son of a General. "
General?! No, no, I am the son of an emperor reptilian! Stop inventing balls, this is the only real truth.
Motherfuckers sparaballe of CICAP "
Anchor with invented ste relationships. My mother is Syrian (the star Sirius B), that lived right on the star, you know, loves the heat
"RenzoColameo always on you tube
A beautiful wooden hand, would you honestly think. "
Oh yes! 'S always the best way to impose the real truth, it is known that the reason is always on the side of what" wood "for the courts.
In a desperate quest for fame is reflected in some have indulged in rather imaginative stories, such as Corrado Penna reported on his blog
version of our conversation a few months ago. Unfortunately for him when he wrote and published a long time on this blog
and then anyone can verify how things really went.
First of all, I noticed how many continue instead of calling me Mr. Dr. Angioni Angioni. For heaven's sake I would be fine or even Simone Angioni, but if you really want to be formal and stating the title is correct, otherwise someone might think that you are trying to hide the fact that I have skills?!
The article starts with:
"Some time ago Mr. Angioni wrote me an email invitandoni [sic really]
to a public debate and (sic) to observe the sky with him." reread our conversation was enough to note that I did not have written to invite him to a public debate, but to clarify that he had made some assumptions about me on his blog.
At the end of one of mail invited him to show me in person all these anomalies, I had volunteered to observe with some instrument alleged "chemtrails."
So it is not true that I wrote to invite him to a public debate and the less I have never invited. Why manipulate the facts? Why do not quote my mails that are public for some time on this blog, but come up with a fanciful tale?
Maybe because in fact his "friendly response" was difficult to justify, and told the story that justifies the higher your "run like hell."
Penna's article goes on to show two very evident that evidence should be hard to deny. The first is the usual interview over 2 anni fa a Radio Base (chissà perchè nessuno cita la data e la fa apparire come un'intervista recente) la cui risposta alle obiezioni è pubblicata
qui da vari mesi.
La seconda sono delle immagini satellitari che mostrano scie di condensa circolari in riferimento ad uno studio del Dott. Haywood (questa volta il titolo è stato messo, che strano). In effetti è difficile da smentire questo lavoro e infatti non parla di chemtrails, ma di contrails.
Tra i vari lavori di Haywood si trova
questo dove, guarda un po', a pagina 20 si trovano anche le analisi del contenuto delle scie di condensazione, cosa che avevo già riportato anche su questo blog.
Perchè dovrei smentire qualcuno che me right? I think he knows only Penna. Although
invent a story to make it appear that I consider it an important partner, quoting an article pro contrails believing the lie, to quote the text of an interview without even reading it and not realize that my position on the "strange routes" is public for years both on this blog about this in the Cicap is a very good sign of mental confusion. We hope she can make order as soon as possible.
We come to a light news, but still very disturbing. 
